The International Intercollegiate Mining Games was founded in 1978 to honor the 91 miners who died in the 1972 Sunshine Mine disaster, as well as to promote interaction among mining schools and keep traditional mining practices alive.  This event has been held every year since its inception, often in the United States, Australia or Great Britain.

This year marked the first time in several years that UK sent two teams to the games and the first time UK has ever sent a men’s team.  The teams placed well in several events, including a fourth in the co-ed hand muck and fourth in the co-ed survey.  Overall, the co-ed team placed 11^th out of 15 and the men’s team placed 17^th out of 18.

The seven events included the following: hand muck, which involves filling and pushing a two ton ore cart down a track; track stand, where teams lay rail for ore carts; swede saw, where team members cut through a 6”x6” piece of timber; jackleg, where two team members drill with a pneumatic drill into a concrete block for three minutes; surveying according to traditional methods; gold panning, which involves searching for flattened BBs in dirt and, finally, hand steel (or single jack), in which five team members drill using hammers and steels into a concrete block for two minutes each.

Last year the Camborne School of Mines hosted the event in Falmouth, Great Britain. The Missouri University of Science and Technology will host the event in 2014.

The post University of Kentucky Competes in the 35th International Intercollegiate Mining Games appeared first on College of Engineering.

(Frankfort, Kentucky – February 1, 2013)

This award recognizes those who have made outstanding contributions to the engineering profession and to their communities over the course of their young careers. Darin is an active member of the Kentucky Society of Professional Engineers (KSPE), and has previously served in many capacities. Hensley currently holds a leadership position within the organization. He is an alumni of the prestigious Leadership PE program that has received acclamation nationally for its leadership development principles.

Originally from Harlan County, Kentucky, Hensley attended the University of Kentucky graduating in 2001 with a Bachelor’s of Science in Civil Engineering. Upon graduating, he began his career in earnest and first volunteered for KSPE, more specifically for Kentucky’s MATHCOUNTS program.

MATHCOUNTS is a middle school math program that helps to develop the future engineers of America. Darin has been involved in many aspects of the program, serving as Chair in 2008. “I find my work with MATHCOUNTS extremely rewarding. When I see the look on a parent’s face after we have presented their child a scholarship, well, there is not much that touches your heart more,” says Hensley. Darin was previously honored by KSPE for his efforts promoting the MATHCOUNTS program. In 2010, he received the Outstanding Contribution to MATHCOUNTS award and again in 2012, receiving the D.V. Terrell, PE Award for Superior Service to KSPE. Hensley had an active role in obtaining thirty-nine new scholarships, bringing the total number of scholarships that Kentucky MATHCOUNTS awards to seventy-two.

Hensley earned his Professional Engineering licensure in 2005 after passing a rigorous examination. He states that, “Obtaining my license was an important milestone in my career, one that I encourage all young engineers to seek.”

Hensley freely admits that this is not an individual award. “We work as a team. EA Partners is much like a big family, working together to effectively complete our projects.” Darin serves as Project Engineer to multiple roadway design projects for the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. Under his leadership, and through their team’s efforts, EA has successfully completed many projects saving the taxpayers of Kentucky time and money.

Hensley says he could not have done it alone, “ I must especially thank my wife Kim and my two boys Evan (5) and Cooper (2). They support me through the ups and downs and I dedicate this award to them. Thank you to my parents for always supporting me. Finally, thanks to God for his many blessings. They say it takes a village to raise a child, I thank all that had a part in my education and my lifelong experiences, I would not be where I am today without them.”

Contact: Marcie Fisher, KSPE, 160 Democrat Drive, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, 502-695-5680

The post Darin Hensley receives KSPE “Young Engineer of the Year” Award appeared first on College of Engineering.

write solutions to an engineering problem. Students from Kentucky, Tennessee and Northern Alabama attended the event.

Teams began the day by answering questions regarding their table-top scale city model and the competition culminated with each team delivering an eight minute presentation to a panel comprised of UK College of Engineering students and alumni.

UK College of Engineering faculty member Bruce Walcott, who led the hosting effort stated, “This is the 11^th year that I have been involved in the competition and the eighth year that we have hosted it. Joe Percefull, who is the Director of the Future City Regional Competition, has done a fantastic job of getting the word out. He brings a lot of energy to the competition.”

Walcott added that winning teams from each regional competition will join 36 other regional winners at a national competition in Washington D.C. during Engineers Week. Second and third place teams are invited to exhibit their models during the UK College of Engineering’s Engineers Day open house on Saturday, February 23^rd.

Walcott also noted that such an event would not have been possible without the many UK College of Engineering volunteers who gave their time before and during the competition.

“We rely heavily on the student section of the Kentucky Society of Professional Engineers to do the heavy lifting that is necessary to conduct this competition. Rachel Adams—a UK civil engineering senior—diligently recruited volunteer judges and graders for the software simulation part of the competition. Emily Dotson at the eStudio led the effort to grade the research essays and alumna Andrea Ramsey made a special trip back to the campus from Tennessee to judge the special awards. Also, because it is necessary to sequester teams so that they will not hear the judges’ questions ahead of time, the Kentucky Alpha chapter of Tau Beta Pi, represented by Adrianne Shearer and David Spencer, engaged the students in a ‘newspaper bridge building’ exercise in the spirit of the Future City theme. I’m extremely thankful for everyone’s hard work and enthusiasm for this unique event.”

A complete list of volunteers who helped to make this year’s competition possible:

Regional Director
Joe Perceful

Essay Graders
Emily Dotson
Brandon Wellman
Amber Troxell

Judges for Presentations
Kristin Cardin
Mike McHenry
Forrest Simmons
Stacey Schal
Joe Moore
Katherine Young
Billy Payne
Rachel Adams
Andrea Ramsey

Newspaper Bridge Building Volunteers
James Forshee
Adrianne Shearer
David Spencer
Sam Meffert

SimCity Software Simulation Graders

Cody Cousins
Admin Husic
Trae Thompson
Teng Wang
Konrad Kutter
Katherine Young

Food Arrangements
Vicki Cooper

Photographer
Katherine Walcott

More information about the Future City Competition can be found at http://futurecity.org

The post UK College of Engineering Hosts Regional Future Cities Regional Competition appeared first on College of Engineering.

Read Full Article

The post Sore Subject: Dr. Babak Bazrgari’s Human Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Laboratory Takes Aim at Low Back Pain appeared first on College of Engineering.

Read Full Article

The post Transylvania partners with the University of Kentucky for a new pre-engineering program for Transylvania students appeared first on College of Engineering.

Read Full Article on UKnow

The post Computer Engineering Sophomore Wins Freeman-ASIA Award to Study in Japan appeared first on College of Engineering.

That is the tag line for a new application named “Crowded,” developed by the Lexington-based mobile application studio Stadionaut. The app challenges fans watching live Major League Baseball games—whether actually attending or watching on television—to predict what will happen next. Users compete against other fans to earn various rewards and prizes. The social aspect of the application combined with real-time action and updates could turn the casual baseball fan into a loyal supporter of the Major League Baseball brand—at least, that is what Stadionaut, which is comprised of several graduates from the University of Kentucky College of Engineering, believes is possible with their first app.

From left to right: Scott Wagner, Evan Leach, Chris Allen, and
Jim Wombles

Stadionaut is led in part by Scott Wagner, who graduated with a B.S. in computer science in May 2012 and Evan Leach, who earned a B.S. in animal science from the College of Agriculture in December 2011. Other graduates from the College of Engineering include Chris Allen (BSCS, 2010) and Wes Walker, who will graduate with a B.S. in computer science on December 14.

Stadionaut was launched in August 2011 after participating in Lexington-based Awesome Inc.’s startup incubator program during the summer. The basis for “Crowded” originated over the three-month program, during which they were mentored through the process of developing the idea and the business model.

“The University of Kentucky introduced us to the startup accelerator program, Awesome Inc., and continues to support us through resources such as the Von Allmen Center, iNet and its ties through Commerce Lexington,” said Stadionaut co-founder Scott Wagner.

With an eye toward making “Crowded” available for Android and iOS for the 2013 MLB season, Stadionaut representatives recently pitched their product to decision-makers at this year’s MLB Trade Show.

“The MLB Trade Show was a great opportunity for ‘Crowded’ as we were among the top baseball executives in the industry,” emphasized Wagner. “We were proud to represent the University of Kentucky and the emerging startup community in Lexington by presenting ‘Crowded’ to a national audience.”

Stadionaut won the grand prize at the inaugural iNet Venture Challenge, a business competition for University of Kentucky student entrepreneurs last March.

The post Computer Science Alumni Pitch Mobile App at MLB Trade Show appeared first on College of Engineering.

Read Full Profile

The post Teacher and Traveler: UK Paducah’s First Hired Professor, Jim Smart appeared first on College of Engineering.

Computer science is a dynamic field where, as Ken Calvert, Ph.D. and chair of the Department of Computer Science, states, “The only way to stay on the leading edge is to invent everything.” Consider that 10 years ago, Facebook, Twitter and iPhones didn’t exist and iPods and digital internet were just coming into play. Ten years from now, what will serve as our technological staples—and have the ideas for those creations even been conceived? Thinking about the future of computer science necessitates a short-term perspective because the industry sheds its skin with increasing frequency. Nonetheless, questions about the opportunities and perils abound: Are innocent, everyday folks who simply want to catch up with high school friends or purchase a cookbook at the mercy of malevolent, identity-thieving hackers? How will sea changes in the industry, such as the advent of cloud computing, affect traditional computer science jobs? And how can anyone hope to keep up with waves of technology hailed as cutting-edge one year and disregarded as antiquated the next? To sort through these questions, we sat down with Calvert and Jim Griffioen, Ph.D., professor of computer science and director of the Laboratory for Advanced Networking.

Q: What are shaping up to be the greatest areas of opportunity in the computer science field over the next few years?

K.C. I think this is an exciting time in computer science. Hardware has become so cheap that both compute cycles and storage bytes have essentially become commoditized. We’re seeing this right now with the cloud computing model. A company can now pay someone a relatively low monthly fee to run their web server instead of shelling out thousands of dollars for hardware, software and maintenance. It’s basically the same transition that happened with electric power 100 years ago. Nicholas Carr’s book, The Big Switch, describes how, back then, factories had to be located next to big streams because that’s where they got the power to run their machines. When electric power grids came along, generation of power became centralized. The same exact centralization is happening with the advent of cloud computing. It makes a lot more sense to have one big centralized data center run by people who know what they’re doing than for every little company to run its own.

J.G. Historically, computer scientists have created technology without fully knowing how it’s going to play out. The internet was built so machines could communicate back and forth and share information. Well, then users came along and said, “I need this to be easy to use. I need a web interface. I need a browser.” None of those uses were part of the original design. Now we have virtualization through cloud computing as well as ubiquitous networking—you can be on the network at all times. In addition, we also have a very mobile society. Devices which can maximize the benefits of the cloud will need to be developed. I think we’re on the edge of some of these things just exploding and once it explodes, we’ll have a whole new set of issues to address—how to secure such a world, etc.

K.C. What virtualization also means is that software is going to be king. Everything is going to be about software because hardware is so cheap. I think the opportunities in software are tremendous. However, as Jim mentioned, we now have to consider questions such as: how do I keep control of my information? How do I know what information people are collecting about me? Businesses already know a lot about us and they are going to try to monetize that any way they can. Why do Facebook and Twitter have such astronomical valuations?  I believe it’s because they know who is talking to whom and what they’re saying. Privacy is a huge issue going forward and it’s not just “old people” who are concerned about it. We need to understand how to maximize the benefits of virtualization without the Big Brother risks.

Q: What does the future look like on the security front?

J.G. When everyday users weigh the prospective gain of a new application against the possible security risks, they almost always accept the tradeoff. It is difficult to keep up with potential threats and understand the risks because the landscape changes so quickly. On the positive side, though, industry has finally recognized that security is not an afterthought. In the past, companies created products and tacked security onto the back end of the development process. Often, that made it hard to add the security because it wasn’t present from the start. Now, computer scientists are asking, “How do I design the architecture so that if it doesn’t have security now, it is amenable to it later?” There are discussions going on right now about the next generation of the Internet. Naturally, security is a central topic.

K.C. As long as we have the Internet architecture we have, we’re not going to solve many of the current problems. The architecture doesn’t have the things we need to solve them, and there’s just too much inertia to counteract. So it’s hard to say what the future is going to look like there. But again, almost as important as security is privacy. When it comes to the leaders in software and social media, people aren’t given a choice to use the product and still maintain their privacy. Those companies say, “Here are our policies, take them or leave them.” And people agree, even though the policies are not in their favor, because they want to use the product. I printed out the iTunes license agreement once. It was 29 pages of 9 point font. No one is going to read that! That’s why I think we really need more collaboration between experts in computer science and experts in psychology. As systems get more and more complex and everyday people have to make decisions about privacy settings on their computer or home router, we need to design systems and educate users so the consequences of each decision they have to make is much clearer. That is certainly not the case right now. Unfortunately, until software providers accept accountability for their products—until they have incentive to change—the situation will remain challenging.

Q. What areas in the field besides security and privacy need attention?

K.C. We need to focus on parallelism. You often hear that Moore’s Law is running out of gas. On the contrary, Moore’s Law is still going strong; but the dividends of Moore’s Law are now being paid in parallelism, not in faster sequential computation. Rather than doing each step of the computation faster, you can do multiple steps at once in the same amount of time.

J.G. As far as teaching parallelism in the classroom, we have to change our approach. We’ve been teaching the students a step-by-step process; basically, that’s how computer scientists have always conceived writing programs. Well, now we have multiple processors running on chips and we have to start thinking, “How do I write a program that does three things at once? Eight things at once?” What happens when the chips allow us to do hundreds of things at once? We need to start changing the mindset of everyone in our program and challenge them to think, “I’m going to do lots of things at once.”

K.C. If you’re only doing one thing at a time, you cannot take advantage of the additional power that Moore’s Law is giving you. So, like Jim said, we have to be able to figure out how to do multiple things at once, like putting meat on the stove to brown and, while that’s happening, mixing other ingredients. That’s the way we need to think about things all the time. It’s not trivial. We want to turn out graduates who can master doing things in parallel because this is the way it’s going to be from now on. Right now, though, the tools we have for taking advantage of Moore’s Law and parallelism aren’t very good, so it’s definitely an area that needs attention.

Q. How much of a challenge is it to stay on the leading edge of an industry where technology changes so rapidly, let alone translate those changes into your curricula?

K.C. It’s almost impossible. We could spend all of our time just trying to keep up. It’s a catch-22: we have to show our students technology and let them get their hands dirty, but the reality is whatever we show them as freshmen will have changed and might even be obsolete by the time they are seniors. Five years ago, everybody was using Perl and CGI scripts on the web. Now those tools have been replaced by a new generation of languages and platforms. So, our task is to teach fundamental principles and I think we do a good job of that. Fortunately, students quickly adapt to the rate of change. They’re fearless and not afraid to pick up new technology and play with it. I consider that a good thing and we need to try to leverage it in the classroom.

J.G. At the same time, we faculty have to make the purpose of learning fundamental concepts and principles clear to them. They have to know that chances are whatever programming language we teach them their freshman year will probably be out of date by the time they graduate. The turnaround times really are that short.

K.C. That actually seems to make it easier to motivate our students to learn the fundamentals, though, because incoming students have seen the short life cycles of various technologies several times already.  It’s pretty obvious to them now that if they don’t focus on the stuff that doesn’t change, they’re not going to be able to adapt when they’re forced to.

J.G. Even though I’m a longstanding faculty member, I often learn from the students. There is so much software out there, so many programs, so many computing languages, that I can’t play with them all. Students will come to me and tell me about a program and I’ll say, “Explain it to me. How does it work? What does it do?” I learn a lot from interacting with them.

K.C. The only way to stay on the leading edge is to invent everything. We have a weekly “Keeping Current” seminar, where students share what they’ve learned or some new technology they’ve discovered. They’re always coming in and telling us about stuff we’ve never heard of. It’s a volunteer thing, very informal, but a lot of fun. There are so many tools around, it’s just unbelievable.

Q. How does the future of computer science look from the perspective of college students choosing it as a career?

K.C. It couldn’t be better. In the early 2000s, people were afraid all the computer science jobs were going to be outsourced overseas. That hasn’t happened. In fact, the Bureau of Labor projects software engineering jobs will grow by 38% over the next ten years—one of the top professions as far as growth. Our students are in demand and will continue to be in demand for a long time. I am constantly being contacted by people wanting to hire our graduates. It’s clear there are more jobs than people to do them, and I don’t see that changing.

J.G. I was contacted by a mid-sized company the other day that decided they were going to get into the mobile world, but didn’t have a clue as to how to go about it and wanted to know if any of our students or graduates could help them figure it out. Companies need people who know how to take advantage of the technology, not just throw around terms. One aspect that will change in light of the switch to cloud computing, however, will be the kinds of jobs available. There won’t be as much need for systems administrator jobs if everything is run through a centralized data center. So what a graduate might do once they’re in the marketplace might change, but the demand is still very high.

K.C. Our goal is to equip students to be able to adapt to change. We teach them how to think and how to learn because that’s the only way they’re going to survive. If they think they’re going to learn C++, graduate and be a C++ programmer all their lives, it’s just not going to happen.

Q. What are some myths and misconceptions about the computer science industry?

J.G. One myth I often hear is that all the exciting stuff is happening in industry. “Companies are where the exciting things are happening,” someone will say, downplaying the need for education in the field. While it’s now true that bright high school kids can get programming jobs with big companies right away, we still believe in the importance of developing a skill set based on the fundamentals that will last a long time.

K.C. I think another myth is that computer science is all about programming. Computing professionals need to have an understanding of programming, but it’s even more important to have a broad understanding of the business you’re in: social networking, data mining, business concepts, etc. The future is about applications and applying computing to problems in biology, medicine, engineering, the environment, business, entertainment and other industries—it’s a great time to be a software entrepeneur! Another myth is that computer science is something only guys would want to do. The stereotypical image of scruffy-haired guys with beards staring at computer screens needs to be replaced by one which illustrates the openness of the field to anyone who wants to get in on the opportunities available.

The post The Future of Computer Science: An Interview with Ken Calvert and Jim Griffioen appeared first on College of Engineering.

“I am grateful to our faculty volunteers and student organizations like Kappa Delta Sorority and Society of Women Engineers (SWE) who work hard to make sure GEMS is a rewarding experience for the girls,” said Vicki Cooper, who coordinated the event. “They generously sacrifice their time to teach and inspire girls who could become future engineers.”

The girls began the day listening to former UK president Lee Todd share his story about developing a childhood interest in engineering as the result of a similar outreach program.  To emphasize his point, Todd displayed the project he created when he was a boy as he recounted his career.

Following the keynote address, the attendees participated in three interactive sessions led by College of Engineering faculty and graduate students. Challenged by event coordinators to present STEM education in ways that compel students to want to know more, faculty members Bruce Walcott, Debby Keen, Kimberly Ward Anderson, Nancy Miller, Chuck May, Christine Trinkle and Czarena Crofcheck engaged students through hands-on demonstrations, games and experiments. Walcott, who is involved with several such outreach programs, is encouraged by how programs like GEMS benefit Kentucky.

“It is critical to the economic future success of the Commonwealth of Kentucky that the UK College of Engineering continues to conduct outreach programs such as our Girls Enjoying Math and Science (GEMS) Day. This program promotes engineering and math and science to young women at a time when our State and Nation needs more women entering the engineering workforce. Our partnership with the Girls Scouts and Susan Miller makes an ideal platform to promote the importance of the STEM education disciplines to young women.”

The post GEMS Outreach Event Attracts Over 250 Participants appeared first on College of Engineering.